home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: amiga.ow.nl!aTmosh
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.marketplace,comp.sys.amiga.games
- From: aTmosh@amiga.ow.nl (Thomas Tavoly)
- Subject: Re: Diff between OS 3 and 3.1?
- References: <lozinskiDLHI4w.Iry@netcom.com> <Pine.SUN.3.91.960121075733.28217C-100000@garcia.efn.org> <4duhuf$ocl@news.jhu.edu>
- X-Newsreader: GRn 2.1 Feb 19, 1994
- MIME-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- Message-ID: <aTmosh.0rpq@amiga.ow.nl>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 96 14:01:27 GMT+2
- Organization: Wait a minute, maybe I can find where I wrote that down..
-
-
- In article <4duhuf$ocl@news.jhu.edu> robodude@deanwong.rad.jhu.edu (Zsolt Szabo) writes:
- > In article <Pine.SUN.3.91.960121075733.28217C-100000@garcia.efn.org>,
- > Bill Baker <bbaker@efn.org> wrote:
- >
- > >It would take several pages Dave.
- > >Take the plunge 3.1 is by far the best O.S. you can get on any platform.
- > >(Now if we could just get more speed and more programers to write
- > >software. (sigh)) *not that I don't like the programs available :}*
- >
- > It would take several pages to document the differences between 3.0 and
- > 3.1? I think not.
-
- Depends on whether you wanted that in shorthand notation of the 10 most
- important changes, disassembly, C source or centerfold glossy paper fold out
- with diagrams and commercial ranting all over..
-
- Upgrading to 3.1 is worth it, if not for something else, then just for
- supporting AT.
-
-
- . Thomas Tavoly + A4000 = aTmosh@amiga.ow.nl _ .
- . WWW - http://www.cistron.nl/~ttavoly _ // .
- . Finger - ttavoly@cistron.nl [.sig v4.0] \X/ .
- ... >>> Amiga - Back for the future! <<< ...
-
-